Dear Home Educator...

English For Life®The Madsen Method® is a field-tested, non-consumable, use-it-with-all students, non-graded, integrated (language arts skills are never taught as “Subjects” and students of varying ages may be taught together), research-based, complete** English Language Arts course of study (Speech, Penmanship, Spelling, Grammar, Written Composition, Reading, Self-Study Preparatory).  It is fully scripted (for teachers and students).  No training is required.  Its underpinning is Phonemic Awareness (which is Explicit Phonetics or Phonogram Study).

** Complete means that using our non-graded, non-age-specific, fully scripted study guide, you will teach all of English in 6 to 8 years, laying the foundation for self-study in the first 3 to 4 years, teaching yourself and all your children what other language arts programs (philosophies) do not, even cannot, teach in 12+ years!

In a rather large "nut shell" that’s what it is!

Author/Master Teacher, Sharon Madsen, began teaching in 1966 but soon discovered she (and many others) could not teach all their students to become "independent" in correct speech, penmanship, spelling, reading, grammar, written composition, and reading … let alone tasks that required self-study.

Hoping to learn how, she completed a K-12 Special Learning Disabilities Master of Arts Program (SLD).  In 1970-72 she dispensed two federally funded SLD programs, but the programs’ "compensatory" standards were unacceptable; the intention to remediate students was missing.  She refers to special education programs then and now as "handholding, ineffectual, keep children in ignorance but keep teachers employed and schools afloat education."

Wholly disappointed, she began examining “the history of how to teach a sound-symbol based language.”  During the next 20 years, 72 teachers, mostly home educators, joined her (she joined them; both are true) in examining evidence about how to teach and what to teach.  In 1990, Mrs. Madsen began incorporating their collective research into a scripted presentation so they could teach themselves and their children (children of many ages and many needs) English proficiency.  At the same time, thirteen schools participated in field-testing their original scripts.  The Madsen Method® is the what to teach and how to teach result.  To date, 600 home school teachers have participated in the ongoing project.

Our program is a complete language arts curriculum.  The program is both diagnostic and remedial; as the teacher guides students through its scripted pages, they (both teachers and students) identify all “holes” in their language arts shields—and fill them.  It is the complete body of knowledge we call English language arts:  there is nothing else to buy or teach.

The oldest test we could find was standardized for spelling in 1915.  The test also is an indicator for speaking, spelling, written composition, and reading proficiency.   This test is provided with the program.

Mrs. Madsen reassures parents and teachers:  "What's in a student's file is not the most important part of the picture.  What is most important is an evaluation of the instruction he has received!"  She says:  "If he can speak and hear and manage a pencil and see, I can teach him!"  Without hesitation she adds, "So can you!  English for Life®—The Madsen Method® is a proven tool; we offer it to you!”

What does history show?   Spelling is the “performance indicator” that reveals a student’s overall literacy level.  Therefore, knowing how to spell facilitates acquisition of all language arts content and skills.  To become a good speller, a student needs to know the sound-symbol units words are made of.  There are 88 of these phonogram units (a, ay, eigh, th, pt, rh, sc, r, f, t, etc.).  A student should learn to say and write them early in the language arts instructional sequence.  Syllable eight is a two sound-symbol unit frequently-used, English speaking/spelling pattern: eigh and t (two sounds are represented by two symbol units).

If we don’t teach these sound-symbol units as a basis for spelling, we are asking each student to remember hundreds (thousands) of word configurations (alphabet letter arrangements), which is nearly impossible.  The solution is to teach students to say and write the sound-symbol units all by themselves; then use them to spell the frequently-used, English speaking/spelling patterns through a seven-step, say and write, spelling process.  The result is:  the student understands how words are spelled and he only had to study and apply 88 sound-symbol units instead of memorizing as many as 80,000 word configurations.  88 vs. 80,000!  Sounds like a good trade out to me.  The equation illustrates why our forefathers could teach English so well, so fast!

Encoding (spelling) is the basis for decoding (reading).  A student may do well in the first 3 grades (the statistical average) with “remembering how some words look.”   But in Grade Four, when word difficulty begins to accelerate, students quickly fall behind because visual memory cannot keep up with “new word acquisition” demands.  How many words can a student simply “remember?”   Sight word memorization, writing alphabet letters in blanks, circling letters, drawing lines from words to pictures, copying words, and using alphabet letters to spell words neurologically puts all students at risk but also does not equip them for future language arts tasks.

Phonics’ instructional demands require a fourth grade student to spell at least 2 grade levels above his current grade.  How well is your child spelling?  The test that measures his current level should be one that is generic, not one that measures only what his spelling program is teaching him.  Choose an objective standardized spelling measurement tool.  We use the Morrison McCall Spelling Scale, which was standardized in 1915 when literate spelling was valued, literate spelling that is still the standard for English proficiency.

The bottom line is:  All students can learn to read by learning to spell!  Good spellers are invariably good readers while the opposite is not true.”  A good speller is a well-balanced, fully literate student because he can SPEAK, SPELL, WRITE, READ, engage in SELF-STUDY, and TEACH ANOTHER! 

Research shows the test of a language arts program’s efficacy is who does not learn by it.  All students participating in the field-testing of The Madsen Method® demonstrated proficiency!  Why?  The program is shaped on history’s objective, observable, verifiable facts—facts that show us what works the fastest with the most students—facts that show how all students attain fast and permanent language arts acquisition!

With our program, all parents—if they can read the script—can be “good teachers” without expensive training.  And they can see that their students are developing proficiency in every language arts skill.

This program integrates all language arts basic skills in an optimal instructional order:  individual speaking; handwriting (printing); spelling through phonogram study; vocabulary development by verbally directing the learning of his four-member neurological TEAM; correct speech through phonogram study; in-unison choral rehearsal; independent reading; oral and written grammar; notebook development; chart making and chart interpretation; there is more.  See Program Description.

This program integrates all cognitive skills in an optimal neurological order:  attention, memory, organization, analytical thinking, association, and comprehension.

This program is a complete Tool Kit.  The student will learn each tool's name and use.  On his subsequent journey through the "language arts world," he will find he has the Tools to perform every English language arts task, plus he will perceive structural likenesses between English and other sound/symbol languages (like Latin, Spanish, Italian, French, German, Russian, Greek, etc.), making acquisition of these languages easier.

Let’s go back to the most urgent question:  Why is The Madsen Method® guaranteed to work with all students?”  The teacher appears to perform miracles.  However, credit goes to the method of instruction.  It gives each student a “natural learning advantage,” using his neurological strengths to repair and remediate his learning weaknesses, as he guides his TEAM to join together in learning his language!  It is the method used in early American colonies when literacy was nearly 100%.  It did not have a name and was not written in a teaching manual but was passed on through practice and was described in fiction and nonfiction books, and essays and letters written during that time.  See Bibliography  (H.L. Menchen; The American Language, 1941 Edition)

Though nearly hidden in modern curricula, we have unveiled substantial historical information (and our teachers still are finding more evidence supporting our instructional choices).  We have named the forefathers’ method of instruction Full-Spectrum Neurological Response Instruction (NRI) to depict the historical way English was administered, integrated, applied, and mastered.  Our scripted presentation brings this kind of teaching to light.  All a teacher has to do to achieve excellent, even extraordinary, results is follow this program's explicit say and do script!

Sincerely,

Joe and Sharon Madsen:  Line & Precept Education Foundation®

NOTE:  Thanks to Sherry Frattini for editing our Web Articles and Letters to Teachers, thereby improving my understanding of the inseparable oral/ written English Grammar partnership.

We use our forefathers' method of instruction.

English for Life®—The Madsen Method® P. O. Box 4298 Helena, MT 59604 1-800-640-3607 info@madsenmethod.com